Skip to content

Gaarawarr Gabs with Josh Drescher – Part 2

July 29, 2009

Part 1 of the interview with Josh Drescher covered topics ranging from Mythic’s past to the possibility of new races in WAR.  Here in Part 2, we continue with more focused questions on WAR and Mythic.  But don’t worry, we get one last humorous tale from Mythic’s past as well. 🙂

So, read on as we discuss Capital Cities, the RvR Campaign, the Mythic/BioWare rumors, and more…



“Never say never” seemed to come up a lot throughout this interview.  While not always the answer someone wants to hear, I found it encouraging.  I’d much rather play a game where the possibilities are limited only by time and not imagination, and that really came across as Mythic’s only limiting factor in all my discussions with them.  As players, we all very much want things to happen “now now now” but that isn’t always realistic.  I find myself falling into that unrealistic state of mind occasionally as it’s a very easy thing to do.  However, these conversations firmly cemented my ability to be patient with WAR…for now,  hehe.   Hopefully they help more people feel the same way.

Back to the interview…

GG:  It was originally stated that WAR would have multiple capital cities, two for each pairing.  That was changed ultimately to just one pair of cities.  Will there be a point, even if it’s with an expansion, where we’ll see those additional cities put into the game?

Josh:  You never say never, but it is one of those things where, at the moment, we are far more interested in getting the existing capital cities to be fun, or more fun.  We look at the experience that players are having there, and throughout the campaign, and we’re not happy with how it’s behaving.  So again, you never say never, but at the moment, in terms of capital cities, we pulled them for a number of reasons way back when and there are core design reasons why it was the right thing to do.  To try and channel as much attention as possible into two coherent end points rather than having there be six potential places where the action is taking place at any given time.  So again, it’s always a possibility, but probably not something you are going to see any time in the near future.

GG:  Some people like to complain that currently (it’s always server-dependant) the campaign moves really quick.  It’s really easy to move through and it feels like you’re not accomplishing anything, even though you’re doing something.  But it doesn’t feel like you’ve done this really big epic thing that, with the Warhammer Tabletop game, some huge army would accomplish.  With some of the upgrades to Keeps, it’s kind of like you started to see ways to make them harder to take.  Are there plans in the works to make the Tier 4 campaign more progressive, in that it really feels like a campaign and not just something you did in two hours?

Josh:  Absolutely.  I would say, just from a personal standpoint, the fundamental weakness that exists currently is lack of population.  It’s much, much more difficult to progress the campaign if the population of the server is sufficiently high.  You’re actually having to fight your way tooth and nail through every section of that campaign, which is always what we had envisioned.  Which is why, not to continue to go back to Jeff’s Magic List, but population is one of the top five things we’re looking at right now and we are looking at that from a number of standpoints, some that we can talk about and some that we can’t.  Some of the things, like coherent server merging, are some things we are looking at now.  We have announced new character transfers for a couple of servers.

We recognize that a lot of the game elements are extremely dependant on the other players just being around.  It sounds unbelievably simplistic to say, but it’s one of those things where it’s a cascading improvement.  If you have more players on a server, a lot of different things just get more fun.  RvR, obviously, is much more engaging when there are other players, but things like Public Quests are also dependant on populations.  So, one of our goals over the next 6-9 months is finding some very interesting and creative ways to address Tier 4 and game-wide populations and then allow that to bootstrap and improve all sorts of different things in the game.

Now, mechanically within the campaign — again this gets into those areas where you are just going to have to trust me because I can’t talk about specifics just yet — there are a lot of changes that are going to be made where we hope both improve what we would call the cadence of the campaign, the speed at which it moves, and also the impact of any one part of it.

At the moment, you mentioned the sense that you get of the tabletop game vs. a persistent virtual world experience.  You can’t ever make them the same because you are, in that virtual world, one entity within a large (and let’s just be honest) not particularly well-controlled army.  On the tabletop, you are the one guy that gets to decide:  What does the avant-garde do?  What does the rear guard do? Am I going to flank them from the side? And you can bring to bear hundreds of units in a coherent way.  You can’t do that in MMOs.  Not currently.  Barring having a magnificently organized guild, it’s going to be very tough to replicate that kind of attitude or sense of things.

So we kind of steer in the opposite direction and go:  How can you make the chaos of battle as much fun as possible?  And so we have started to look at where the choke points are where, if I am involved in the campaign, I’m not happy.  So Fortresses right now are just a big frowny face.  You get in there and they don’t perform the way we want them to you know, the overall experience.  They’re pretty and the promise is nice, but if the experience isn’t engaging then you might as well not be having it.

We are trying to identify all those different points and go:  OK, what can be done to sanely improve this and make it fun?  So, if I am only there for this section of the campaign, what happens when I am taking Praag that makes Praag distinct and fun?  And when we push into the next thing, if I have to go be with my kids or go to work or whatever, I don’t feel like “Oh, I missed the good part of the campaign!”  We want them each to be enjoyable in their own way and then really lead up to the city capture and city defense being something that is exciting and interesting.

You will be seeing a lot of new thinking about how the cities behave as well, and trying to incentivize defense, even if it is obvious the city will fall.  There should still be a reason you would want to stick around and fight ’til the end.  It has to kind of be the Helm’s Deep vibe where you go “Well, our goal really is not to win here.  Our goal is to hold them off for as long as possible.”  And how do you have that experience in a coherent way?  So that’s what we’re looking for in terms of improving the tempo and the cadence and then also the individual sections of the campaign.

GG:  So, I have a friend who has played the tabletop game forever and obviously loves it.  They told me I had to ask this question.  They love the Tomb Kings expansion and the Land of the Dead, but they love the Tomb Kings lore in general, and the first thing they said was “Well, this is just the Necropolis of Zandri, but there are a lot of different places.”  And that made me think.  It is called the Land of the Dead, but the zone is called the Necropolis of Zandri.  Is there a chance in the future for us to see more Necropoleis?

Josh:  Absolutely.  The initial implementation of the Land of the Dead was intended to be focused and to provide some very specific things for the game.  Partially because there are things that, in the past, we found players really enjoy — things like RvR-gated dungeons.  But then also, we hadn’t ever really tried some of the platform-style interaction that you get with Land of the Dead content, and we really weren’t sure how it would work out.  And so [we did that] before we committed to the “Let us build the entire Land of the Dead” and there was only a section of the team working on that at any one time.  We had a lot of people working on day-to-day maintenance, bug fixes, improvements, and the types of stuff that you almost certainly talked to the other people on the team about.

So, again, it’s one of those “never say never” [things.]  I’m not promising that we are going to go out and expand it any time soon, but obviously it’s one of those things where it would be awesome to have everything there one day.  I would love to have Lustria but you would have to find a coherent way to put it in.  I think we did some perfectly satisfactory hand-waving to get people from what is essentially the Old World to the Land of the Dead.  We could certainly go “And the blimp will also take you to the realm of the Lizardmen.”  You never know —  Lizard-blimps.

GG:  This is a question more about Mythic as a studio.  Players heard about all the stuff around Mark Jacobs, EA’s announcement about BioWare and Mythic, and all that change-up.  A lot of the players look at the different aspects from different viewpoints.  Some of the main [rumors] are:  BioWare was brought in to save Mythic.  BioWare was brought in so they could learn from Mythic’s mistakes.  BioWare was brought in because they decided it was cheaper to combine everyone and half the people are getting fired.  BioWare was brought in because they have no experience with MMOs and Mythic has a couple under their belt.

Josh:  It’s a vast Lizardmen conspiracy.

GG:  There we go.  The truth was heard here first!

Josh:  It’s one of those frustrating things where the answer I’m going to give you is both the truth and the one you’ve been hearing over and over again.  I mean, you’ve been walking around all day and, while I don’t expect you to know what all the guys at BioWare look like, there is no one from BioWare here.  We don’t have a BioWare office.  There’s no BioWare executive in one of the corner offices.  We don’t have a bunch of people on loan to them (which is not to say we wouldn’t be willing to do things hand-in-hand with them.)  I’ve mentioned from time to time, anything that might make it possible for me to one day visit Skywalker Ranch including, but not limited to, custodial duties.

GG:  Only if I get to carry your bags.  😉

Josh:  The serious answer is that it is a little bit of each of these things that you mentioned.  Is it about BioWare saving Mythic?  No, we don’t need to be saved.  Is it about BioWare helping us to buttress some of the places where we could use a little more assistance?  Absolutely.  Being part of a coherent umbrella studio group under the games label will make that possible for anybody who is developing massive online properties [within the EA family.]  The fact of the matter is that it is very easy to get in that “splinter-cell” mentality.  Not Splinter Cell the game, but in such that we are building our own thing here and we are independent of you over there.  And while in some ways that is good as it insulates you from other groups and others’ shenanigans, you also wind up with a lot of redundant activity where there is no reason for BioWare to solve a problem we have already solved.  And that can be as simplistic as “How do you integrate a customer service database with a catalog of players, items, and inventories?”

It’s not sexy stuff, but it’s stuff that takes a lot of time and resources to build and think of all the weird things, and it just happens that we have been doing that for 10 years.  Is it that we have experience they can learn from?  Yes.  But it is also an efficiency thing.  There is no reason for us to be building the same thing in five different ways when we’ve got a way that works.  And so it really is kind of…  “business as usual” is the best way to describe it.  Anything that happens with Mythic was going to happen one way or the other, so we are independent of the BioWare stuff.

The boring answer is that what was announced initially is true today.  However, I would accept a lightsaber at any time if Ray and Greg would like to send me one.  I know that they’ve gotten to hold real ones.  At E3, apparently, they had a guy from Lucas Arts and they actually had a briefcase with original, straight-up legit, these were on-film, lightsabers and Paul got to hold one for, like, two seconds.

GG:  So it’s obviously apparent from what we have heard that you guys definitely have a roadmap, things you want to get done, but you’re also very much listening to the player-base.  Are we going to be seeing some major announcements as far as the next… I mean, the Tomb Kings just came out and there’s a new Live Event coming out for the end of the summer that looks great… but are we going to be seeing something big about the future of WAR other than just the letters about what’s getting fixed right now?

Josh:  You’ll continue to see the type of additional content that you’ve been seeing since launch.  So, Live Events and so forth, you should just assume will continue indefinitely.  Will there be announcements of more core things?  Yes.  Do I know when you’ll get them?  No.  It really is like I said, we’re at a point where we are not necessarily directed by the player-base so much as we have configured ourselves and configured our leadership in a way that makes it easier for us to respond to the feedback that we’re getting from players.  Like I said, it takes time to get a product out in the wild and then look back at it with objectivity.  We’re in that place now where we can look objectively at what we’ve done.  We can look at some of the choices that we made that were not the right choices, and we have the freedom of movement necessary to address some of those core, fundamental challenges.

So you’ll continue to see things, primarily from Jeff [Hickman] in his Executive Letters, explaining not just where WAR is going, but where all our products are going, and where the studio is going.  Things like that.  So you should expect to continue to see those and, yeah, there will be big things on the horizon that I think players, at the very least, will be very enthusiastic about.  They may be polarized the way they often are, but it’s one of those things where we’re trying to do what’s right for the game and it’s going to be very interesting to be a player as you see the crazy things we’ve got brewing.  The new “Andy” class is going to be excellent.

GG:  Ahh…the “Mythic Andy?”  I hear it’s going to be unlockable like Jedi in the original Star Wars Galaxies…

James Casey (UI & ToK Team Lead):  I thought it was actually “Mythic Candy?”

Josh:  So years and years ago, we would get phone calls every now and then from people that would get their credit card bill and, depending on how it had been printed out, sometimes the spacing of the letters was a little wrong.  And there was apparently one company where, when you’d get your itemized bill, it wouldn’t look like Mythic Entertainment it looked like “My Thic Entertainment.”  And for some reason, every now and then, you’d get a person that would go… and clearly this was symptomatic of an underlying challenge in their relationship with their spouse… but they interpreted that as “My husband is buying porn on the internet again.  $15 a month is going to My Thic Entertainment.”  So we would get these weird phone calls that the people on the phones would have to deal with and it was always exciting.

GG:  “Don’t lie to me!  Put that hussy on the phone!”  My Thic Entertainment:  Ruining marriages for years and years and years…

James:  That’s probably true anyway…

Everyone’s laughing at this point…

GG:  “Just come to bed!”    “No!”

Josh:  Oh, so you’ve seen Andy’s documentary?

And more laughing…

Andy:  Let’s talk as little as possible about that…

Josh:  I didn’t realize it, but somehow or another I’m on the mailing list for the Syndicate.

James:  I thought you were going to say for My Thic Entertainment…

And even more laughing…

Josh:  And on that note, enjoy the remainder of your visit.  Thank you very much.  It was good talking to you.

GG:  Thanks!

And so ended my time with Josh Drescher.  Thanks again Josh for taking the time to sit down with me.  Especially as often as you kept having to come back and see if we were ready since all the other interviews kept going long…  hehe.  What can I say?  I gab. 😉

Stay tuned in the coming days/weeks for the rest of the Mythic interviews.  The interview with Nate Levy, Combat & Careers Strike Team Lead, will be coming soon!


15 Comments leave one →
  1. July 29, 2009 1:03 pm

    Quick note, since folks seemed confused/worried last time:

    When I say “6-9 months” that doesn’t mean we won’t be rolling anything out for that long – it’s just a general dev cycle length. You’ll start to see things MUCH sooner than that, with additional improvements rolling out over that entire period.

  2. July 29, 2009 1:56 pm

    More love for this.

    It’s a massive wall of text, but thoroughly engaging the whole time. Interviews like this keep me happily dumping my portion of sub fees into the game. Herald posts and Dev Letters just aren’t the same as a casually informing sit-down with a real life fan of the game. Of course, as a Warhammer shill, I couldn’t stop loving the game if I tried. :p

    Wouldn’t it be crazy if our friendly Devs and Producers at Mythic wandered the country popping in on fans for casual sit-downs?

  3. July 29, 2009 3:11 pm

    Great interview. Kudos to Gaarawarr and Josh/James/Andy.

    I’m really excited for the exciting changes that you can’t tell me about but are nonetheless excited for. 😀

  4. July 29, 2009 3:51 pm

    Maybe another great unseen surprise fix. 🙂

    I need to roll a destro toon I think. There’s some really “broken” ones I’d like to try out.

  5. theerivs permalink
    July 30, 2009 8:33 am

    Great Interview!

  6. Rif of Dark Crag permalink
    August 1, 2009 5:43 am

    “And when we push into the next thing, if I have to go be with my kids or go to work or whatever, I don’t feel like “Oh, I missed the good part of the campaign!” We want them each to be enjoyable in their own way and then really lead up to the city capture and city defense being something that is exciting and interesting.”

    And this is why WAR’s sub number will continue to dwindle. I will keep it simple. Scenarios are for the casual PvPer. The T4 oRvR campaign is for the hardcore. Wanna know why DAOC’s old frontier RvR was so immersive? No flight masters. No warcamps. Just you and your raid out in the wild, deep in enemy territory. But no, devs like Drescher insist on continuing the watered down, boring mechanics of the current system so that “WAR can be everywhere.”

    Sorry, but WAR can’t be everywhere. It isn’t even everywhere in its current form. Last night I waited for 15 min on a zone line waiting for a zone flip doing NOTHING. That’s boring.

    • Mykiel permalink
      August 1, 2009 9:57 am

      I am pretty sure Drescher is a Producer and not a Developer.

  7. killahsin permalink
    August 1, 2009 11:54 pm

    wars numbers dwindlign have very little to do with not being hardcore. in fact the more hardcore your pvp/mmo is the less subscribers your going to get in the NA region. So stop trying to be prolific when you state your opinion. Everything in this interview read is exactly the direction war needs to be heading in to expand, not contract, its player base. I was totally surprised by alot of his answers, and am very impressed.

  8. Rif of Dark Crag permalink
    August 2, 2009 4:55 am

    “wars numbers dwindlign have very little to do with not being hardcore. in fact the more hardcore your pvp/mmo is the less subscribers your going to get in the NA region. So stop trying to be prolific when you state your opinion.”

    Kettle, meet pot. At least you acknowledge that WAR’s numbers are shrinking.

    Here’s some facts for you. WAR’s numbers have been dwindling, despite everything they’ve done. New classes for free? Subs drop. Supply lines? Subs drop. Tokens for loot? Subs drop. Dom system? Subs drop. LotD? They’re doing server mergers a month later. Nerf AOE/CC? It hasn’t been a month yet, but based on previous data, you can probably safely bet on subs dropping again.

    These are all things that blogs like this one praise, yet none of these improvements, by Mark Jacobs own standard, added another server to the game.

    So why should we expect anything that these people think up now will bring more players to WAR? We shouldn’t; something is fundamentally wrong with the core design of the game.

    I love the IP. Its such a shame its online manifestation is so lame. God forbid Dr. Ray lets any of these guys near SWTOR.

    • gaarawarr permalink
      August 2, 2009 7:27 am

      Wow, Doom meet Gloom. Sheesh. Let’s set some things straight here:

      1. As much respect as I have for Mark Jacobs, when he made his statements regarding servers and merges, he was completely ignoring the way modern MMO subscribers act, to WAR’s detriment.

      Successful or not, modern MMOs start with huge numbers that rapidly dwindle in the following six months. It’s called “tourism”. Lots of people try games for X number of months and then go back to their old MMO or move on to a new one. That’s just how it works now and you have to be prepared for it. WAR wasn’t prepared.

      2. The recent server xfers would normally have happened before the LotD release, but you can’t realistically do that right before an expansion or major patch. It would destabilize servers too much and the data that you would get off your expansion/patch release would be extremely skewed and almost unuseable. Hence waiting until LotD was released and things had settled down a bit before doing the xfers. If you want to put your head in the sand in regards to things like that, go ahead, but keep that utter crap on the forums and off my blog.

      3. As far as my praising of changes, yeah, I praised a lot of changes. However, I also predicted the issues surrounding AFK warcamp grinding for tokens/renown in this blog and have been highly critical of not only the underlying motivational mechanics of the game, but also the victory condition. But hey, I guess you didn’t bother to read those posts since that would totally destroy your theories about me.

  9. Rif of Dark Crag permalink
    August 2, 2009 10:02 am

    Were you critical of the game? I don’t follow this blog except for this one interview, but hell, I believe you, and I’ll apologize for my tone if you need the stroking.

    But so what? All the criticism from all the fansites, blogs, and forums doesn’t mean jacksquat. If the decreasing number of paying and playing customers isn’t feedback enough, then I don’t know what is. God knows they hyped the product enough, so buzz wasn’t the issue.

    Ask yourself if the server xfers would be taking place at all if real improvements were being done to the game. And the 6 month mark has long passed, and how many new servers have been added?

    If I were an EA investor I’d have some questions.

    • gaarawarr permalink
      August 3, 2009 6:55 am

      Honestly, I do think server happend six months into the game regardless. I posted my reasonings as to why on the WA forums. However, seriously, this isn’t a discussion forum, it’s an information site. If you want to discuss the interview, go to WA and do it there. I just present information, you can do with it what you will.

    • August 6, 2009 9:18 am

      “this isn’t a discussion forum, it’s an information site.”

      It’s your blog and you’re more than entitled to do what you want with it, but given the lack of any obvious commenting policy on your site, I think people are going to automatically assume you ARE interested in discussion on your comment-enabled blog.

      This is just my personal opinion but when someone posts articles on a blog of interest to a community that has commenting enabled, they should be held accountable for what they say and willing and able to back up it up (aside from unfounded, ridiculous, and cruel accusations of course). If you aren’t willing to do that, you might as well just disable the commenting feature imho.

      Again, it’s just my opinion, but one I feel most bloggers share. It’s kind of a “code of conduct” thing. Simply filtering out anything you don’t agree with (not saying you’ve done that) doesn’t leave a great impression on those seeking out the information you’re gracious enough to provide.

    • gaarawarr permalink
      August 6, 2009 12:54 pm

      I’d do that in heartbeat quite frankly, except sometimes people need answers to questions that are related to the information I post and I like to be able to help them.

      However, if I wanted long, ranting, drawn-out, pointless discussions, I’d run a forum with the blog. If people want that, they can go to VN or WA where they make posts referencing these interviews and make their comments there. Even if I did post up some kind of commenting policy, who would actually read it? Not the people whining, imo.

      If people don’t choose to go to forums to discuss things and continue to try to hold ranting, illogical, biased “discussions”, I won’t disable comments and hurt the people who enjoy the game and just want to find information about it. I’ll just make all comments need to be approved first.

      As to why I don’t have rules set up for comments like you seem to think I should, I never needed them before. People came here for what I offered: information. They took it and at time asked questions, but it was rare that people just went off on rants. Until about a week ago, I never even deleted a pre-approved comment on my blog ever. I have once now because the statements made in it were entirely and completely inappropriate for public consumption on this blog. It would have gotten that person banned on any forum, so the comment is gone.

      Quite frankly, I put a lot of effort into making these available for the public to read. It doesn’t make me want to bother if all I get are people harping about what I’m able to provide. If they want different information, they can go get it themselves. It’s not easy though, which is why I think they like to just sit back and complain. That’s a whole lot simpler.


  1. Gaarawarr Gabs with Josh Drescher – Part 1 « Gaarawarr Gabs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: